HRW GHG Emissions Methodology FY22/23

Prepared by: Rawstone Consulting Ltd
For: HRW
Date: 1st March 2024

 

Introduction

HRW is committed to measuring, managing and reducing their GHG emissions with the overall aim of limiting climate change.

This document sets out the methodology that HRW used to calculate their carbon emissions for FY22/23, the company baseline.

Total scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions were 26 tCO2e (market-based method), and emissions from selected scope 3 categories were 72 tCO2e (fuel- and energy- related activities, business travel and employee commuting).

 

Scope

GHG emissions have been measured for all operations relating to Healthcare Research Worldwide Ltd, “HRW” including any subsidiaries or joint ventures.

 

Reporting Period

Emissions for FY22/23 cover those from 1st April 2022 – 31st March 2023 inclusive.

 

Method

GHG emissions for the company have been measured in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard, with reporting boundaries defined by the operational consolidation (control) approach.

Scope 2 emissions have been measured using both the location-based and market-based method, with the latter being used for performance tracking (baselines and targets).

 

Conversion Factors

GHG emissions have been calculated using conversion factors for carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). There are no known emissions of other greenhouse gases. The emissions factors used are the UK Government conversion factors for 2023.

 

Emission Sources and Methodology

Emissions reported cover scope 1 and 2 and selected scope 3 sources. A description of all emission sources and their calculation method is presented in Table 1.

 

Scope
Emissions source
Description
Relevant?
Measured?
Methodology
1 Gas Gas used in the company’s leased offices in Wallingford (UK) and New York (US). Y Y For the shared UK Wallingford office, utility bills were used, with emissions apportioned to HRW based on the proportion of headcount based there at year end. For the US New York office, emissions were estimated based on a per person average for US offices in a business in the same industry. No gas is used at the UK London office.
1 Business travel Travel in vehicles hired/leased for business used. Y Y No vehicles are directly owned or long-term leased by the business. There was no short-term car hire in the period.
1 Refrigerant leaks Emissions arising from leaks in air conditioning units. Y Y Air conditioning service records for those units that are the operational responsibility of HRW. There are no such units currently.
2 Electricity Electricity used in the company’s three leased offices. Y Y For the shared UK Wallingford office, utility bills were used, with emissions apportioned to HRW based on the proportion of headcount based there at year end. For the shared UK London office, emissions were estimated based on a per person average for UK offices in a business in the same industry. For the US New York office, emissions were estimated based on utility bill spend, which was converted to kWh based on a price per kWh from a similar office in the same city.
3 Cat 1: Purchased goods and services Emissions from all company purchases, including IT software and professional services. Y N These emissions have not yet been measured.
3 Cat 2: Capital goods Capital goods, including IT equipment and other assets. Y N These emissions have not yet been measured.
3 Cat 3: Fuel- and energy- related activities Well-to-tank emissions from gas, business travel, and the transmission and generation emissions for electricity Y Y Calculated for all measured scope 1 and 2 energy sources (i.e. gas and electricity).
3 Cat 4: Upstream transportation & distribution Transport-related emissions relating to category 1 and 2 purchases. Y N These emissions have not yet been measured.
3 Cat 5: Waste generated in operations Waste generated in the company offices. Y N These emissions have not yet been measured.
3 Cat 6: Business travel All business travel in vehicles not owned/leased by the company Y Y Data for air and train travel is predominantly from a third-party travel management company. Other travel emissions are based on expense claims, where distance is calculated based on the application of an average price per km.
3 Cat 7: Employee commuting Emissions associated with employees commuting to/from HRW office locations. Y Y Employee survey to assess habits over a two week period, scaled to apply to the whole year.
3 Cat 8: Upstream leased assets Operation of assets leased but not included in scope 1 and 2. N N Emissions from leased offices are all included in scope 1 and 2 emissions.
3 Cat 9: Downstream transportation & distribution Transport-related emissions relating to products produced by HRW. N N HRW provides a service and does not produce any products.
3 Cat 10: Processing of sold products. Processing of intermediate products sold by downstream companies. N N HRW provides a service and does not produce any products.
3 Cat 11: Use of sold products End use of goods and services sold by HRW. N N HRW provides a service and does not produce any products.
3 Cat 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products Emissions arising from the end-of-life treatment of products produced by HRW, N N HRW provides a service and does not produce any products.
3 Cat 13: Downstream leased assets Operation of assets owned by the reporting company (lessor) and leased to other entities N N HRW does not lease any assets to third parties.
3 Cat 14: Franchises Operation of franchises in the reporting year. N N HRW does not have any franchises.
3 Cat 15: Investments Operation of investments. N N HRW does not have any investments, joint ventures of subsidiaries not included in scope 1 and 2.

 

Table: Emission sources and methodology

 

Reported emissions are estimated to cover >95% of scope 1 and 2 emission sources, and ~50% of scope 3 emission sources. Steps to expand the data collected and improve data collection methods will be taken over the coming years.

 

Emission Figures and Baseline

HRW’s total measured scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions for FY22/23 were 98.0 tCO2e (market-based method).

 

Scope
Emissions source
Market-based method tCO2e
Location-based method tCO2e
Scope 1 Gas 20.2 20.2
Business travel De-minis, reported in scope 3, category 6
Refrigerant leaks 0 0
Scope 2 Electricity 5.9 11.5
TOTAL SCOPE 1 & 2
26.1 31.7
Scope 3

 

Cat 1: Purchased goods and services Not measured Not measured
Cat 2: Capital goods Not measured Not measured
Cat 3: Fuel- and energy- related activities 4.2 4.2
Cat 4: Upstream transportation & distribution Not measured Not measured
Cat 5: Waste generated in operations Not measured Not measured
Cat 6: Business travel 62.6 62.6
Cat 7: Employee commuting 5.0 5.0
TOTAL MEASURED SCOPE 3 71.8 71.8
TOTAL MEASURED SCOPE 1, 2 & 3 98.0 103.6

 

Table 2: HRW’s scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions for FY22/23.

 

Recalculation Policy

The GHG emissions for FY22/23 form the baseline against which reduction targets will be set. Should these change significantly due to merger, acquisition, change of calculation methodology or discovery of significant errors, the baseline will be retrospectively recalculated and externally published. The significance threshold for this is set as a cumulative impact (increase or decrease) of >=5%.

 

Appendix 1: Comparison of scope 1 & 2 GHG figures to SBT submission

 

Scope
Rawstone calculations (Kg CO2e)
SBTi submission (Kg CO2e)
Variance (%)
Comment
Scope 1: Gas 20,215 26,282 30% Small difference (425 KgCO2e) in New York numbers due to employee figures of 22 (SBTi) vs. 23 (Rawstone). Difference of 5,642 KgCO2e in Wallingford numbers because of a difference in apportioning of total office emissions – 100% (SBTi) vs. 67% (Rawstone). The latter reflects the office share with MMR Group.
Scope 2: Electricity 5,907 13,094 122% Small difference (115 KgCO2e) in New York numbers due to employee figures of 22 (SBTi) vs. 23 (Rawstone). Difference of 7,072 KgCO2e in Wallingford numbers due to the use of the general UK residual mix emission factor (0.35117) rather than supplier-specific emission factors for E.ON Next and EDF energy.
TOTAL SCOPE 1 & 2 26,121 39,376 51%

 

Appendix 2: Data improvement opportunities

Steps to expand and enhance data collection methods are recommended as follows:

  • Expand data collection to include scope 3 categories 1, 2 and 4 which can all be measured through the spend-based method and application of industry emission factors in year one.
  • Expand data collection to include waste (scope 3 category 5). This can be through the spend-based method but a better way would be to look at the volume and frequency of bin collection and use this to calculate emissions.
  • Engage with the landlords of the New York and London offices to obtain more detailed information on electricity (both offices) and gas (New York) usage (e.g. kWh/therms). Alternatively, HRW could directly take meter readings, if access permits.
  • Explore opportunities to enhance the expense system to capture additional travel related data. In particular, look at ways to:
    • Readily identify expenses that relate to a mode of travel (i.e. rather than food, accommodation or other expenses). Currently this is manually done based on descriptions provided.
    • For flights booked through expenses, to always include the to/from destination, ticket type (single/return) and travel class (economy, premium economy, business, first).

 

Cookies

We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. We can also use it to analyze the behavior of users in order to continuously improve the website for you. Data Policy

analytical Essential